September 23, 2010

Louie, Louie You're Gonna Die


LOUIE, SEASON 1

Louie is very much unlike any other show I’ve ever seen. But, there are certain elements that are typical for a 30-minute comedy. It is certainly not the first television program to address the difficulties of dating or raising children. Nor is it the first to feature a schlub as the protagonist. Louie also uses stand-up comedy interludes, like Seinfeld, to give the show structure.

But Louie is unlike any other show I’ve ever seen, not because of anything in its form or content, but because of how it’s made. Louie is the only modern television program that is, at its core, a one-man show. Louis C.K. writes, directs and stars in every episode. In an interview, C.K. said that making the show taught him that he did not need a team of writers to help him generate content.

And it’s interesting to see the effects of a show made almost entirely from the ideas of a single person. You’d expect that it would make the show, at best, more focused and intentional, or at worst more repetitive and homogeneous. Instead, Louie is incredibly scattered. It’s clear that the show is as varied as C.K.’s mind, and also just as twisted. As a result, the show constantly defies expectations. Every new sketch or segment is different than the last. This can be jarring, but it also creates constant opportunities for comedy and, at times, poignancy.

Although the content of the show clearly centers on C.K.’s real-life biography (it is about a divorced comedian named Louie C.K. with two kids, after all), no two episodes are even remotely alike. Some are absurdist and self-deprecating sketches, like the pilot and Heckler/Cop Movie. Some are buddy comedies, such as Poker/Divorce, which is actually like two completely separate 15-minute buddy comedies. And some of them are not very funny at all, but contain captivating monologues that are delivered by supporting characters (Bully, God).

Additionally, the show is more edgy (though some may prefer to say lewd) than anything I’ve ever seen attempted on basic cable. A dentist puts his dick in Louie’s mouth while Louie is under anesthetic, for one example. This is moments after the hallucinating C.K. stumbles across Osama bin Laden in the desert and says that, though it may be oversimplifying the issue, 9/11 was a bullshit move.

There’s an auteur element to Louie as well. In numerous sketches, drugs or dreaming affect C.K.’s consciousness in a way that is represented using cinematic techniques. He gets high at a neighbor’s apartment, cuing a series of rapid cuts and continuity errors that mirror his suddenly fractured perception. Also, the childhood Louis C.K. is represented by no fewer than three different young actors across the first season. The actress that plays his date in one episode plays his young mother in the next.

By utilizing such artful methods, C.K. conveys the impression that these little bits and sketches are meant to be more than just a sitcom. The show strives to do more than entertain. It makes a statement about how bizarre and difficult just ordinary living can be.

Possibly the most incredible thing about Louie is not its original style, but the fact that it got picked up for a second season. Perhaps it will suffer the same short run as other breakthrough series, such as Arrested Development, whose genius are only realized by an adoring public just moments after they are taken off the air. But maybe not. After all, Louie is made by only a single man who does just about every job and only draws one salary. In essence, it is a high-budget YouTube video, a student comedy film made by a master comedian. Far be it from me to speculate on what may be “the future of television” in an era when the network prime-time dramedy is becoming less sustainable. But, at the very least, Louis stands as an example of how modern television can be brilliant with just a camera, a few crewmembers and one very funny man.

September 16, 2010

The Twist


PREDICTIONS FOR DEVIL

The trailer for the new M. Night Shyamalan movie, Devil, portrays a psychological/religious thriller. Here’s how the movie seems to play out:

• A group of strangers gets into an elevator
• The elevator stalls
• While the strangers wait for help, one or two strange things happen
• Someone suggests that one of the strangers in the elevator is the Devil
• Everyone tells that person to get fucked
• More strange things happen
• "Oh my God! Somebody in this elevator really is the Devil"

Suddenly, all the strangers in the elevator must fight for their lives, while at the same time trying to figure out which of them in this confined space is the biblical Lucifer. As viewers, we will also be invited to speculate.

Is it the guy in the business suit? Too easy. The hot chick? Maybe. The black guy? That would be racist. Questionably unshaven man? Old lady?

Anyway, in the end we are going to find out the answer. Then they’ll role the credits. Then we will all be allowed to go home.

Except anyone familiar with Mr. Night Shyamalan knows that it won’t be that easy. There has to be some sort of twist ending. Just because he made The Last Airbender, does not mean that anybody forgot. To be fair, M. Night did not direct or write this movie, he just came up with the story. But to me, that sounds suspiciously like code for “he came up with the twist, then didn’t bother to do anything else.”

So what’s the twist going to be? Since M. Night Shyamalan thinks that an intelligent film means that the ending is really hard to guess, it will not be easy to anticipate. But I have some ideas:

The Devil is someone not in the elevator

• There are some security guards and firefighters in the trailer that are trying to get the strangers out. Maybe one of them is Devil. If this is the case, then another one is also probably God. Also, watch out for some sort of wager.

All the people in the elevator are collectively the Devil

• In the trailer, a security guard (or firefighter) can be seen yelling into a walkie-talkie, warning the strangers about the Devil. In the movie, he will probably be the only one that believes that the Devil is real, and all the other security guards and firefighters will laugh at him. Perhaps the events in the elevator are not real and have actually been contrived by Devil to torment the security guard. In the end, he realizes it was a test of his faith or that the Devil just did it to be dick. He is the Devil, after all.

There is no Devil

• For Christ’s sake, I hope this isn’t it. Here's how it would go: At the beginning, none of the characters believes that it’s the Devil. But after a while, they become convinced because of all the supernatural events occurring in and out of the elevator. At the end, it turns out that there’s a perfectly plausible explanation for everything that happened and we’re all a bunch of stupid idiots for thinking that the Devil was in an elevator just because someone told us he was and because it’s the goddamn title of the movie. If this is the twist (which again, I really hope it isn’t), then there will be some moral about how the real Devil is the potential evil inside of all of us. Cue groans.

Everybody’s dead

The Sixth Sense was his highest grossing movie to date, so maybe he’s going for a repeat. If they are all dead, then it’s an elevator to Hell or, more likely, the elevator itself is Hell.

The elevator is not really an elevator

• Maybe they accidentally wandered into an empty broom closet. Or perhaps it isn’t an elevator full of strangers, but actually a kangaroo pouch full of marbles. I don’t know how this one would work, but undermining the basic assumption that they are actually in a real elevator is just the kind of twist he would go for.

Something you could not have seen coming, so you should not have bothered guessing

• In The Happening, everyone in the world started committing suicide and no one knew why. In the end, it turned out that (look away now if you don’t want to know) plants were making them do it with special pollen. Somehow, the plot then turned into a message about climate change. This made the film like a slightly more boring version of An Inconvenient Truth (zing). But anyway, there was no possible way to guess the twist ahead of time because there were no clues provided in the movie. Point, Shyamalan.

Ambiguous ending/no twist

• This is very unlikely. But maybe, at the end, the elevator will open (probably on floor 13 or 66) and it will be empty. The investigators will investigate, and never find anyone. We will be left to wonder what happened, with no explanation or moral. This would make it dangerously close to what I would call a "good" movie. Like I said: very unlikely. But hey, things happen.

So that’s the best that I got. For some reason, I always get obsessed with M. Night Shyamalan’s movies when one goes to theaters. Maybe that means he's more compelling then I give him credit for. Either way, I probably won’t see this one, but I will definitely read the Wikipedia synopsis tomorrow.